| NTEU Legal Roundup — Week of April 7-11, 2025 We know you want to remain informed about NTEU-related litigation challenging the administration's attacks on federal employees and the fight NTEU is bringing to defend our members from these attacks. Starting this week, we will send weekly (Monday) emails summarizing major case updates from the previous week. We will continue to send case-specific employee messages as appropriate. Stay strong and let's support one another as we battle for the future of the federal workforce! Mass Firings of Probationary Employees NTEU's Challenge to Governmentwide Attacks, including Mass Firings Case name: NTEU et al. v. Trump et al. Court: DC District Court NO UPDATE THIS WEEK AFGE’s Challenge to Mass Firings Case name: AFGE, AFL-CIO et al. v. OPM et al. Court(s): Northern District of California; 9th Circuit Court of Appeals; Supreme Court UPDATE: On April 8, the Supreme Court allowed the CA court-ordered reinstatements to be paused pending resolution of government's appeal. States’ Challenge to Mass Firings Case name: State of Maryland et al. v. USDA et al. Court(s): District of Maryland, 4th Circuit Court of Appeals UPDATE: On April 9, the 4th Circuit allowed for the MD court-ordered reinstatements to be paused pending resolution of government's appeal, following the Supreme Court’s decision in the CA case. Mass Exclusions Executive Order NTEU’s Challenge to BU Exclusions Case name: NTEU v. Trump et al. Court: DC District Court UPDATE: On April 11, the government filed its opposition to NTEU's request for emergency relief, which was filed on April 4. Treasury's Request to Void IRS CBA Case name: Dept. of Treasury v. NTEU Ch. 73 Court: Eastern District of Kentucky NEW CASE: On March 28, the government asked the court for permission to terminate the IRS CBA following the BU Exclusion EO. AFGE’s Challenge to BU Exclusions Case name: AFGE, AFL-CIO et al. v. Trump et al. Court: Northern District of California UPDATE: On April 8, the district court denied the unions' request for immediate relief via a temporary restraining order. Government's Request to Void CBAs Case name: Dept. of Defense et al. v. AFGE District 10 et al. Court: Western District of Texas NEW CASE: Dept. of Defense and seven other agencies asked the court for permission to terminate their CBAs following the BU Exclusion EO. CFPB Dismantling Case name: NTEU et al. v. Vought Court: DC District Court UPDATE: On April 11, the D.C. Circuit partially stayed the district court's March 28 preliminary injunction pending resolution of appeal. For more detailed information on these and other cases, see On the Docket. |
|
| | |
|
Comments
Post a Comment